Reproduzco la entrada de "...y mientras tanto" sobre el proyecto fotográfico de Weronika Krzemieniecka, cuyo trabajo de retoque digital es técnicamente mediocre (se notan las siluetas de algunos de los perros ausentes y sus sombras son inexplicablemente más oscuras que las de sus dueños y demás objetos circundantes) pero muy expresivo y sin duda divertido, además de obviamente oportuno en relación a los temas principales reunidos en "el animal invisible"
Los perros invisibles de Polonia de paseo // The invisible dogs of Poland out for a walk (by Weronika Krzemieniecka)Posted on
Algunas fotos divertidas y algo de manipulación fotográfica de la fotógrafa polaca Weronika Krzemieniecka…
//
Some fun photos and photo manipulation from Polish photographer Weronika Krzemieniecka…
(via: http://twentytwowords.com/)
When something is closer to the ground, the shadow is darker. Look at the shadow uder man's shoe. I didnt change much witch the shadows. Greetings. WK
ResponderEliminarI know that. That is mainly due to diffraction, added on arrival diffuse light reflection from the environment, but in the case of the first picture shown here, is visible rough transit between the darkest shade of dog and the lighter or "contaminated" by the diffused light reflected by objects in the scene. Also, if you look at the last image is sensed removed dog silhouette with touches of cloned buffer (the background is clearer in that area). Moreover, although the shorter the dogs somehow justified in the dark area of the shadow is wider, the effect shows different behaviors in the different examples shown.
EliminarAnyway, you're right to put this in your comment, and there is no doubt that the images are not intended to be so transcendent as to demand photographically senior author technical trim level, which clramente mention the beginning of my own commentary. Thank you very much for your keen observation.